Screener
AIQ vs CGGO
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.21% less per year.
- AIQ covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- AIQ follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AIQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIQ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.6B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.3% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.6% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.35 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.80% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -44.66% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIQ and CGGO
Explore further