Screener
AIQ vs RSSL
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Key differences
- RSSL costs 0.60% less per year.
- AIQ is significantly larger than RSSL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIQ | RSSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8.6B | $1.4B |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 1.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.5% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +36.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.54% | 19.19% |
| Max drawdown | -44.66% | -27.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIQ and RSSL
Explore further