Screener
AMAX vs ADPV
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Adaptiv Select ETF
Key differences
- ADPV costs 0.36% less per year.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while ADPV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; ADPV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | ADPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $171M |
| Since | 2009 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +36.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +26.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 24.05% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -22.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and ADPV
Explore further