Screener
AMAX vs IDUB
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
Key differences
- IDUB costs 0.92% less per year.
- IDUB is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; IDUB uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, IDUB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | IDUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $468M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 5.19% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +32.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 15.36% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -29.21% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and IDUB
Explore further