Screener
AMAX vs IGBH
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGBH costs 1.22% less per year.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while IGBH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; IGBH uses index tracking.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | IGBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $171M |
| Since | 2009 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 5.92% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +10.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 4.10% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -33.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and IGBH
Explore further