Screener
AMAX vs KONG
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
Both AMAX and KONG are alternative ETFs. AMAX charges 1.36% a year and KONG 0.89%. The main difference: KONG costs 0.47% less per year.
- KONG costs 0.47% less per year.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $22M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.96% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.9% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.3% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.31% | 10.95% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -19.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.