Screener
AMAX vs MANI
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | — |
| Since | 2009 | — |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | — |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and MANI
Explore further