Screener
AMAX vs MUSI
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 0.98% less per year.
- MUSI is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while MUSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AMAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $214M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 3.35% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and MUSI
Explore further