Screener
AMAX vs PFIX
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
Key differences
- PFIX costs 0.86% less per year.
- PFIX is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; PFIX uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | PFIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $210M |
| Since | 2009 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 4.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | -13.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 30.79% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -36.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and PFIX
Explore further