Screener
AMAX vs RAAX
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs VanEck Real Assets ETF
Key differences
- RAAX costs 0.67% less per year.
- RAAX is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; RAAX uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RAAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | RAAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $905M |
| Since | 2009 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 1.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +37.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.01% | 13.64% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -33.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and RAAX
Explore further