Screener
AMAX vs TAFL
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs AB Tax-Aware Long Municipal ETF
Key differences
- TAFL costs 1.08% less per year.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; TAFL uses active selection.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | TAFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $49M |
| Since | 2009 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.8% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.98% | 4.28% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -6.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and TAFL
Explore further