Screener
AMAX vs YFYA
Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF vs Yields for You Strategy A ETF
Key differences
- YFYA costs 0.11% less per year.
- AMAX is classified as alternative, while YFYA is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- AMAX follows a option income strategy; YFYA uses active selection.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMAX | YFYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.36% | 1.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $26M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 10.63% | 5.22% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.01% | 3.51% |
| Max drawdown | -16.25% | -2.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMAX and YFYA
Explore further