Screener
AMDL vs FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF vs GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
Key differences
- AMDL is significantly larger than FBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMDL | FBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $944M | $185M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.63% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +956.2% | -25.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +39.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 128.56% | 69.42% |
| Max drawdown | -88.63% | -61.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMDL and FBL
Explore further