Screener
AMDL vs NVD
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF vs Graniteshares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
Key differences
- AMDL costs 0.28% less per year.
- AMDL is significantly larger than NVD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMDL follows a leveraged strategy; NVD uses inverse.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMDL | NVD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $944M | $75M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +956.2% | -71.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 128.56% | 67.92% |
| Max drawdown | -88.63% | -99.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMDL and NVD
Explore further