Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AMDW vs QDTE

Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

AMDW

Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

1.00%

Fund size

$64M

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

Key differences

  • QDTE is significantly larger than AMDW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AMDW follows a multi strategy strategy; QDTE uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

AMDWQDTE
Annual cost (TER)1.00%0.96%
Fund size (AUM)$64M$828M
Since20252024
Dividend yield45.82%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategymulti strategyoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+42.8%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.95%
Max drawdown-34.64%-22.86%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AMDW and QDTE