Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AMID vs IWR

Argent Mid Cap ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

Argent

Annual cost

0.52%

Fund size

$109M

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$52.6B

Key differences

  • IWR costs 0.34% less per year.
  • IWR is significantly larger than AMID — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AMID follows a active selection strategy; IWR uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, IWR has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AMIDIWR
Annual cost (TER)0.52%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$109M$52.6B
Since20222001
Dividend yield0.34%1.19%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+6.5%+21.8%
CAGR 3Y+12.7%+17.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.1%
Sharpe 3Y0.570.86
Volatility 1Y16.10%13.50%
Max drawdown-23.32%-40.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AMID and IWR