Screener
AMLP vs MLPR
Alerian MLP ETF vs ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
Key differences
- MLPR costs 1.01% less per year.
- AMLP is significantly larger than MLPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMLP follows a index tracking strategy; MLPR uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, MLPR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMLP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMLP | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12.6B | $11M |
| Since | 2010 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 7.35% | 8.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.2% | +35.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.2% | +30.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.80% | 20.56% |
| Max drawdown | -72.61% | -48.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMLP and MLPR
Explore further