Screener
AMUB vs ENFR
UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B vs Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.45% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than AMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ENFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMUB | ENFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $460M |
| Since | 2015 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.14% | 3.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.9% | +27.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.4% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.5% | +21.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.43 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.53% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -73.46% | -62.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMUB and ENFR
Explore further