Screener
AMZU vs FAS
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.11% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than AMZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZU | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.93% | 10.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.2% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.4% | +37.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 59.05% | 42.90% |
| Max drawdown | -55.59% | -85.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZU and FAS
Explore further