Screener
AMZU vs HIBS
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- AMZU costs 0.07% less per year.
- AMZU is significantly larger than HIBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AMZU follows a leveraged strategy; HIBS uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, AMZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZU | HIBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $19M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 4.93% | 7.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.2% | -80.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.4% | -62.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -52.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | -0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 59.05% | 67.54% |
| Max drawdown | -55.59% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZU and HIBS
Explore further