Screener
AMZU vs TNA
Direxion Daily AMZN Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- AMZU costs 0.06% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than AMZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AMZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AMZU | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.93% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +44.2% | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.4% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 59.05% | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -55.59% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AMZU and TNA
Explore further