Screener
ANEW vs BFLX
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and BFLX are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and BFLX 0.40%. The main difference: ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- ANEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $11M |
| Since | 2020 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.62% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -3.88% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.