Screener
ANEW vs CGGO
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and CGGO are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- CGGO is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $11.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 17.47% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -24.90% |
Similar to ANEW and CGGO
Explore further