Screener
ANEW vs FFEM
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
Both ANEW and FFEM are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and FFEM 0.60%. The main difference: ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; FFEM uses active selection.
- ANEW follows a index tracking strategy; FFEM uses active selection.
- ANEW costs 0.15% less per year.
- FFEM is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $43M |
| Since | 2020 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 1.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 22.70% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -16.29% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.