Screener
ANEW vs IWB
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and IWB are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and IWB 0.15%. The main difference: ANEW covers global markets; IWB covers North America.
- ANEW covers global markets; IWB covers North America.
- IWB costs 0.30% less per year.
- IWB is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $48.9B |
| Since | 2020 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 0.91% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.6% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.3% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.62% | 12.39% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -34.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.