Screener
ANGL vs HYDB
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.10% less per year.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.0% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.33% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and HYDB
Explore further