Screener
ANGL vs LFEQ
VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- ANGL costs 0.33% less per year.
- ANGL is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANGL is classified as fixed income, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ANGL follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ANGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANGL | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $29M |
| Since | 2012 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 6.31% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.1% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.8% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.7% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.88 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.34% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -29.31% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ANGL and LFEQ
Explore further