Skip to content
Screener

AOA vs AGG

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

AGG

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.03%

Fund size

$136.5B

Key differences

AOA is a mixed asset ETF, while AGG is a fixed income ETF. AOA charges 0.15% a year and AGG 0.03%.

  • AOA is a mixed asset fund, while AGG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • AGG costs 0.12% less per year.
  • AGG is much larger than AOA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, AOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOAAGG
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.03%
Fund size (AUM)$3.2B$136.5B
Since20082003
Dividend yield2.05%3.96%
Asset classmixed assetfixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+21.9%+4.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+4.2%
CAGR 5Y+8.9%+0.2%
Sharpe 3Y1.110.13
Volatility 1Y11.15%3.82%
Max drawdown-28.38%-18.43%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AOA and AGG