Screener
AOA vs GAL
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 0.20% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than GAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOA is classified as mixed asset, while GAL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AOA follows a index tracking strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, AOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOA | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $307M |
| Since | 2008 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.68% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -28.38% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOA and GAL
Explore further