Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

AOA vs OEF

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs iShares S&P 100 ETF

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.0B

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.20%

Fund size

$19.6B

Key differences

  • AOA costs 0.05% less per year.
  • OEF is significantly larger than AOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOA is classified as mixed asset, while OEF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, OEF has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • OEF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AOAOEF
Annual cost (TER)0.15%0.20%
Fund size (AUM)$3.0B$19.6B
Since20082000
Dividend yield2.12%0.88%
Asset classmixed assetequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+24.6%+31.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.5%+25.8%
CAGR 5Y+9.3%+15.9%
Sharpe 3Y1.141.31
Volatility 1Y10.68%12.88%
Max drawdown-28.38%-31.44%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to AOA and OEF