Screener
AOA vs QTAC
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
- AOA costs 1.63% less per year.
- AOA is significantly larger than QTAC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOA is classified as mixed asset, while QTAC is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AOA follows a index tracking strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
- AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOA | QTAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 1.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.0B | $54M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -28.38% | -16.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOA and QTAC
Explore further