Screener
AOCT vs PGHY
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2026 vs Invesco Global ex-US High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- PGHY costs 0.44% less per year.
- PGHY is significantly larger than AOCT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOCT is classified as alternative, while PGHY is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- AOCT follows a structured outcome strategy; PGHY uses index tracking.
- PGHY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOCT | PGHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $70M | $212M |
| Since | 2024 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 7.09% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.62% | 4.98% |
| Max drawdown | -3.71% | -20.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOCT and PGHY
Explore further