Screener
AOK vs BDYN
iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- AOK costs 0.25% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than AOK — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOK | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $756M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.32% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.78% | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.93% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOK and BDYN
Explore further