Screener
AOM vs AOR
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF
Key differences
- AOM follows a index tracking strategy; AOR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, AOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOM | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 2.53% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.2% | +19.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.8% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.55% | 8.47% |
| Max drawdown | -19.96% | -22.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOM and AOR
Explore further