Skip to content
Screener

AOR vs RULE

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF

AOR

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.6B

RULE

Adaptive Core ETF

Annual cost

1.84%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

Both AOR and RULE are mixed asset ETFs. AOR charges 0.15% a year and RULE 1.84%. The main difference: AOR costs 1.69% less per year.

  • AOR costs 1.69% less per year.
  • AOR is much larger than RULE. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, RULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

AORRULE
Annual cost (TER)0.15%1.84%
Fund size (AUM)$3.6B$16M
Since20082021
Dividend yield2.47%0.00%
Asset classmixed assetmixed asset
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+15.8%+40.9%
CAGR 3Y+13.4%+17.5%
CAGR 5Y+6.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.010.81
Volatility 1Y8.71%21.56%
Max drawdown-22.95%-30.48%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to AOR and RULE