Screener
AOR vs VMSB
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF vs Voya Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- AOR costs 0.30% less per year.
- AOR is significantly larger than VMSB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AOR is classified as mixed asset, while VMSB is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AOR follows a active selection strategy; VMSB uses multi strategy.
- AOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AOR | VMSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.5B | $309M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.53% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.95% | -2.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AOR and VMSB
Explore further