Screener
APCB vs GIGB
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both APCB and GIGB are fixed income ETFs. APCB charges 0.36% a year and GIGB 0.08%. The main difference: APCB follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- APCB follows a active selection strategy; GIGB uses index tracking.
- GIGB costs 0.28% less per year.
- Over the last three years, GIGB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GIGB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| APCB | GIGB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $936M | $982M |
| Since | 2023 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.15% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.1% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.13 | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.43% | 4.31% |
| Max drawdown | -6.42% | -22.25% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.