Screener
APCB vs MANI
ActivePassive Core Bond ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- APCB is classified as fixed income, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- APCB covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- APCB follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| APCB | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $919M | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 4.15% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.03 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -6.42% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APCB and MANI
Explore further