Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APIE vs APMU

ActivePassive International Equity ETF vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

APIE

ActivePassive International Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$1.0B

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$224M

Key differences

  • APMU costs 0.10% less per year.
  • APIE is significantly larger than APMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • APIE is classified as equity, while APMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
  • APIE covers global markets; APMU covers north america.
  • Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

APIEAPMU
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$1.0B$224M
Since20232023
Dividend yield3.51%2.64%
Asset classequityfixed income
Regionglobalnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+22.7%+3.9%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+2.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.82-0.37
Volatility 1Y16.13%2.35%
Max drawdown-15.94%-4.39%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APIE and APMU