Screener
APIE vs FFDI
ActivePassive International Equity ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Developed
Key differences
- APIE costs 0.10% less per year.
- APIE is significantly larger than FFDI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- APIE follows a active selection strategy; FFDI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| APIE | FFDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $22M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.1% | +13.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.19% | 17.08% |
| Max drawdown | -15.94% | -14.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APIE and FFDI
Explore further