Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APMU vs APIE

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs ActivePassive International Equity ETF

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$224M

APIE

ActivePassive International Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$1.0B

Key differences

  • APMU costs 0.10% less per year.
  • APIE is significantly larger than APMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • APMU is classified as fixed income, while APIE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • APMU covers north america markets; APIE covers global.
  • Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

APMUAPIE
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.45%
Fund size (AUM)$224M$1.0B
Since20232023
Dividend yield2.64%3.51%
Asset classfixed incomeequity
Regionnorth americaglobal
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+3.9%+22.7%
CAGR 3Y+2.5%+17.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y-0.370.82
Volatility 1Y2.35%16.13%
Max drawdown-4.39%-15.94%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APMU and APIE