Screener
APMU vs IG
ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.16% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, IG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| APMU | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $224M | $179M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 2.64% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.9% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.37 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.35% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -4.39% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to APMU and IG
Explore further