Skip to content
Screener

APMU vs PHYL

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$232M

PHYL

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

Both APMU and PHYL are fixed income ETFs. APMU charges 0.35% a year and PHYL 0.39%. The main difference: PHYL is much larger than APMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • PHYL is much larger than APMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, PHYL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • PHYL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

APMUPHYL
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.39%
Fund size (AUM)$232M$1.3B
Since20232018
Dividend yield2.65%7.66%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+4.1%+7.2%
CAGR 3Y+3.0%+9.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.1%
Sharpe 3Y-0.221.18
Volatility 1Y2.40%3.35%
Max drawdown-4.39%-22.07%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to APMU and PHYL