Screener
AQWA vs CATH
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
Key differences
- CATH costs 0.21% less per year.
- CATH is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CATH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CATH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | CATH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2021 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.42% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -33.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and CATH
Explore further