Screener
AQWA vs EART
Global X Clean Water ETF vs Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
Key differences
- AQWA costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EART has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AQWA | EART | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $26M | $43M |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +112.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +20.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.42% | 37.89% |
| Max drawdown | -29.44% | -53.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AQWA and EART
Explore further