Screener
ARVR vs FAD
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.07% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than ARVR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARVR covers asia pacific markets; FAD covers north america.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ARVR | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $480M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.50% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.4% | +37.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.39% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -26.25% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ARVR and FAD
Explore further