Screener
ASCI vs BUFM
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Key differences
- BUFM is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI is classified as equity, while BUFM is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ASCI covers global markets; BUFM covers north america.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; BUFM uses structured outcome.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | BUFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $397M |
| Since | 2009 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.84% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -9.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and BUFM
Explore further