Screener
ASCI vs IMCB
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IMCB costs 0.66% less per year.
- IMCB is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI covers global markets; IMCB covers north america.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; IMCB uses index tracking.
- IMCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2009 | 2004 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -40.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and IMCB
Explore further