Screener
ASCI vs IWL
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.55% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than ASCI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASCI covers global markets; IWL covers north america.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and IWL
Explore further