Screener
ASCI vs REMG
abrdn International Small Cap Active ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.06% less per year.
- ASCI covers global markets; REMG covers emerging markets.
- ASCI follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
- ASCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASCI | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $95M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.22% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASCI and REMG
Explore further